.
PakFuse
Old Jul 31st, 2009, 03:43 am   #1 (permalink)
Junior Member
 

Join Date: Feb 1st, 2009 - 10:54 pm
Posts: 147
Quote:
A national campaign against first-time drunken-driving offenders is gaining ground as states and the federal government weigh mandatory use of devices requiring violators to prove their sobriety before their engines start.

Three more states have enacted laws this year requiring all violators to install devices called alcohol ignition interlocks, bringing to 11 the number of states with such rules. The instrument blocks a vehicle engine from starting if it detects alcohol on the breath of drivers.

The current version of a federal transportation funding bill, which could be debated by Congress this fall, requires all 50 states to mandate the devices for anyone convicted of drunken driving or risk losing federal highway money. Today, 47 states and the District of Columbia have interlock ignition laws for at least some offenders. Alabama, South Dakota and Vermont have no such laws.

They are installed in about 150,000 vehicles in the USA — a number that would approach 1 million if they were required for every convicted drunken driver.

Proponents of broader use of interlock systems — including MADD, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and the Governors Highway Safety Association — say they would save an additional 4,000-8,000 lives a year.

They point to New Mexico, which was a perennial national leader in alcohol-related crashes in 2005 when it became the first state to require ignition interlocks for all convicted drunken drivers. The interlock law was part of a campaign that has spurred a 35% drop in drunken-driving deaths there.

A federal law on interlocks is a "slippery slope," says Sarah Longwell, managing director of the American Beverage Institute, a restaurant and tavern trade group. "As this creeping mentality about 'don't drink and drive' as opposed to 'don't drive drunk' takes over, you're seeing more officers inclined to arrest people" below the legal limit for intoxication, she says.

The devices place a financial burden on first offenders that might prevent them from seeking treatment, says Carl Wicklund, executive director of the Lexington, Ky.-based American Probation and Parole Association (APPA), which represents 35,000 probation and parole professionals.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...k_N.htm?csp=34
considering that it is in effect in 47 states as of present , how would the first time offender be prevented from seeking treatment ? what are the advantages and disadvantages of having this lock on vehicles ?
saathi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31st, 2009, 10:04 am   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Blonde Baji's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 18th, 2009 - 01:33 pm
Posts: 8,559
Blog Entries: 4
Why dont the car manufacturers install the device in all the cars .
Everything has its advantages & disadvantages .
This device will not only prevent the life of the drunk person but also the life of the others on the road .
Blonde Baji is offline  

See you soon !!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:33 pm.


 
 
Powered by vBulletin®  Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0